Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 17History of Science and Natural HistoryHistory of Science and MedicineHistorical Philosophy and Science

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A History of the Ecological Sciences, Part 21: Réaumur and His History of Insects

Egerton, Frank N.·2006·Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America

Abstract

See PDF.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1890/0012-9623(2006)87[212:ahotes]2.0.co;2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Metadata

Authors
Egerton, F. N.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Parkside (US)
Corresponding author
Egerton, Frank N.
Venue
Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-07
Volume
87
Issue
3
Pages
212-224
ISSN
0012-9623 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1985494287
Cited by
16
References
0
Citations by year
2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
7.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1 (tdm, 3349 d)
Locations
Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › History of Science and Natural History
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › History of Science and Medicine
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Historical Philosophy and Science
Keywords
history of entomology, history of ecology, insect history, 18th-century natural history

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A History of the Ecological Sciences, Part 21: Réaumur and His History of Insects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/0012-9623(2006)87%5B212:ahotes%5D2.0.co;2
The paper
Egerton, F. N. (2006). A History of the Ecological Sciences, Part 21: Réaumur and His History of Insects. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9623(2006)87%5B212%3Aahotes%5D2.0.co%3B2

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.